Why does our Treasury issue currency to the Federal Reserve Banks to distribute to their cronies and then borrow it back at interest to pay for necessary public services and obligations?

What’s been reserved for the banks but control over the symbols of our national assets and the lubricant of trade and exchange? Why have we done that? Why does government by the people have to be “credible” in the eyes of the money men? How are the Wall Street money men different from the mafia don, who insists on taking his “cut” of any transaction (in exchange for providing “security” in the neighborhood)?

The alternative to debt is theft. However, the difference between a gift and a theft is the volition of those doing the giving and, in this case, it’s clearly a matter of law. Giving our money to the Federal Reserve to lend back to us is legal. It’s an arrangement under cover of law, which deprives the people of their natural assets and wealth with their consent. For what?

The issue is not austerity. The issue is deprivation under cover of law. The only reason our assets are not being stolen is because we have agreed to the taking. Having it take place behind the veil of money makes it harder to observe, but the process is the same. The money men take their cut and then complain it’s not enough.

Of course the money men don’t want to pay taxes. They’re tax collectors; not tax payers. They’re double dippers par excellence.